Skip to content
Infilux AppSec Logo
Comparison

ISO 27001 vs SOC 2

ISO 27001 is an international management-system standard certified by an accredited body, with a prescribed clause structure (4–10) and 93 Annex A controls. SOC 2 is an AICPA-defined audit report issued by a licensed CPA firm, attesting to your controls against the five Trust Services Criteria. ISO is more globally portable and preferred by EU / Asia-Pacific buyers; SOC 2 is faster to obtain and preferred by US SaaS buyers. Most B2B SaaS vendors selling globally end up pursuing both.

Dimension
ISO 27001
SOC 2
Issued by
Accredited certification body (BSI, BSI, Bureau Veritas, etc.)
Licensed CPA firm (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, smaller boutiques)
What's evaluated
Management system + 93 Annex A controls
Controls mapped to 5 Trust Services Criteria
Output
3-year certificate
Annual audit report (50–80 pages)
Audit cadence
3-year cycle: initial + 2 surveillance + recert
Annual (Type 2 observation period 6–12 months)
Geographic strength
EU, UK, India, APAC, Middle East
US, North America
Time to first cert/report
6–12 months
4–8 months (after 3–6 month observation)
First-time total cost (USD)
$25K–$100K (audit + tooling + effort)
$40K–$150K
Annual maintenance cost
~50–70% of first year
~60–80% of first year (no holiday)

The two frameworks share roughly 70% control overlap — access control, change management, incident response, asset management, vulnerability management, vendor risk, business continuity. The differences are structural and procedural rather than substantive: ISO defines a management system you certify (the ISMS itself is the audit object), SOC 2 attests to specific controls you operate (no overall 'system' is certified — just the controls).

Audit cadence differs. ISO 27001 has a 3-year certification cycle with annual surveillance audits in years 1 and 2 and a full re-certification in year 3. SOC 2 Type 2 reports cover a defined observation period (typically 12 months) and are re-issued annually. ISO is cheaper to maintain long-term once you have the ISMS humming; SOC 2 is cheaper to start because it doesn't require the full management-system buildout.

Geographic preference shapes the decision. Selling primarily to US SaaS customers: do SOC 2 first, add ISO 27001 when you start landing EU and APAC deals. Selling primarily into EU, Middle East, Asia, India, Australia: do ISO 27001 first; many APAC enterprise buyers will reject 'just SOC 2' as insufficient. Selling everywhere: do both, sequenced. Modern GRC platforms (Infilux GRC, Drata, Vanta, Secureframe) make the dual programme about 30% additional effort over either alone.

When to choose ISO 27001

Start with ISO 27001 if your primary buyers are in EU, UK, India, or APAC; if you face regulatory contexts that name ISO 27001 (RBI CSF references it; SEBI guidance prefers it); or if you anticipate certifying additional ISO standards (27701, 22301, 42001) and want a unified management system.

When to choose SOC 2

Start with SOC 2 if your primary buyers are in the US, especially US-based SaaS enterprise procurement teams who ask for SOC 2 by name in RFPs. Faster initial path. Most US B2B SaaS sees SOC 2 as table-stakes.

Frequently asked

Can we run a unified ISO 27001 + SOC 2 programme?+
Yes. Modern GRC platforms map a single control catalogue to both frameworks. Most of your evidence (access reviews, vulnerability scans, change-management tickets, vendor risk assessments) satisfies multiple framework controls simultaneously. Unified programmes typically run ~30% above the cost of either alone.
Is the new ISO 27001:2022 a big change?+
Annex A was restructured (93 controls in 4 themes, down from 114 in 14 domains) but mostly through consolidation, not new content. Eleven new controls were added (e.g. threat intelligence, secure cloud services). The 2-year transition window closed in 2025 — all active certifications are now on the 2022 revision.

Related services

Other comparisons